<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walgreens: Loreal Preference, Tresemme, Gillette and More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/</link>
	<description>Live Well for Less</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SophieMae</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43440</link>
		<dc:creator>SophieMae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43440</guid>
		<description>At my store, the Tresseme shelf was cleaned out. And the problem with the L&#039;Oreal Q in the booklet was that it was for either the Blonde stuff or &lt;i&gt;plain&lt;/i&gt; Preference. The in-ad Q, apparently, was only for the Superior Preference. I had asked the cashier in that department before I picked it up if there were any other types of &#039;Preference&#039; and she said no, just the Superior. I told them never mind then and left empty-handed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At my store, the Tresseme shelf was cleaned out. And the problem with the L&#8217;Oreal Q in the booklet was that it was for either the Blonde stuff or <i>plain</i> Preference. The in-ad Q, apparently, was only for the Superior Preference. I had asked the cashier in that department before I picked it up if there were any other types of &#8216;Preference&#8217; and she said no, just the Superior. I told them never mind then and left empty-handed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43428</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43428</guid>
		<description>I tried the Tresemme deal today.  I bought 2 of the Tresemme 24hour Body Weightless Creme 5 oz  UPC: 022400624327 $1.29 clearance price and it did NOT print out a RR.  I will return tomorrow and try with a purchase of 3 and see if that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the Tresemme deal today.  I bought 2 of the Tresemme 24hour Body Weightless Creme 5 oz  UPC: 022400624327 $1.29 clearance price and it did NOT print out a RR.  I will return tomorrow and try with a purchase of 3 and see if that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43304</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43304</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty certain the Tresemme deal is buy 3 (not 2) and get a $5 RR.  I&#039;ve done it with 3 of the clearanced items and it worked just fine, the items were $1.29 each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty certain the Tresemme deal is buy 3 (not 2) and get a $5 RR.  I&#8217;ve done it with 3 of the clearanced items and it worked just fine, the items were $1.29 each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercedes</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43299</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercedes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43299</guid>
		<description>Hi Kristina,

That&#039;s why you need to read the add and tags carefully.  there are usually two types these register rewards deals are worded.  Some are get $x in RRs when you buy x number of items and the other is get $x in RRs when you spend $x.  In the case of the toothbrushes the RR was worded as spend $10 get $5 back.  The tresemme deal is buy two and get $5 RRs.  This last type is usually the type when you can get a good deal with clearance finds.
Hope that makes sense.

Mercedes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kristina,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why you need to read the add and tags carefully.  there are usually two types these register rewards deals are worded.  Some are get $x in RRs when you buy x number of items and the other is get $x in RRs when you spend $x.  In the case of the toothbrushes the RR was worded as spend $10 get $5 back.  The tresemme deal is buy two and get $5 RRs.  This last type is usually the type when you can get a good deal with clearance finds.<br />
Hope that makes sense.</p>
<p>Mercedes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammi</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43296</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43296</guid>
		<description>I got a good deal on L&#039;oreal makeup since some of the concealers/foundations ($4.29 clearance) and eye shadows are on clearance ($1.79 clearance).  These still count towards the &#039;buy $20 in L&#039;oreal, get $5 L&#039;oreal RR&#039;.  (count them at the clearance prices)  I even used the $3 and $1 coupons from the 1/3 RP.  I got 4 concealer/foundations and 5 eye shadows and paid about $7 after all of my discounts....still got the $5 L&#039;oreal bonus RR too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a good deal on L&#8217;oreal makeup since some of the concealers/foundations ($4.29 clearance) and eye shadows are on clearance ($1.79 clearance).  These still count towards the &#8216;buy $20 in L&#8217;oreal, get $5 L&#8217;oreal RR&#8217;.  (count them at the clearance prices)  I even used the $3 and $1 coupons from the 1/3 RP.  I got 4 concealer/foundations and 5 eye shadows and paid about $7 after all of my discounts&#8230;.still got the $5 L&#8217;oreal bonus RR too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammi</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43294</guid>
		<description>Kristina, I dind&#039;t do the Tresemme deal yet (the Walgreens I went to didn&#039;t have the clearanced types), but I did the Curel and Jergens deal that was posted not too long ago and got the RR just fine.  All of the lotion was on clearance and I used coupons too.....still got the RR so I don&#039;t think it should matter.  Hope this helps.  Plus you can always return the items if things don&#039;t turn out like you had expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristina, I dind&#8217;t do the Tresemme deal yet (the Walgreens I went to didn&#8217;t have the clearanced types), but I did the Curel and Jergens deal that was posted not too long ago and got the RR just fine.  All of the lotion was on clearance and I used coupons too&#8230;..still got the RR so I don&#8217;t think it should matter.  Hope this helps.  Plus you can always return the items if things don&#8217;t turn out like you had expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina L.</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43281</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43281</guid>
		<description>Has anyone done the Tresemme deal.  A few weeks ago there was a buy 2 Colgate battery powered toothbrushes for 10.00 and get a 4RR.  I did the deal and got one of the clearance toothbrushes and didn&#039;t spend 10.00 so I didn&#039;t get the RR.  I was worried this would happen on this deal as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone done the Tresemme deal.  A few weeks ago there was a buy 2 Colgate battery powered toothbrushes for 10.00 and get a 4RR.  I did the deal and got one of the clearance toothbrushes and didn&#8217;t spend 10.00 so I didn&#8217;t get the RR.  I was worried this would happen on this deal as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie C.</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43280</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43280</guid>
		<description>I went yesterday for the deal and they put up several signs in front of the hair colors stating that there was a misprint on that $3 store coupon and will not be deducted for the PREFERENCE variety. Bummer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went yesterday for the deal and they put up several signs in front of the hair colors stating that there was a misprint on that $3 store coupon and will not be deducted for the PREFERENCE variety. Bummer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rae</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43277</guid>
		<description>For the Tresemme deal do you have to purchase 2 or 3????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the Tresemme deal do you have to purchase 2 or 3????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walgreens: 1-minute Quaker Oats for $0.50 &#124; theoffertree.com</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43272</link>
		<dc:creator>Walgreens: 1-minute Quaker Oats for $0.50 &#124; theoffertree.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43272</guid>
		<description>[...] See some clearance deals at Walgreens this week here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See some clearance <a href="http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/walgreensdeals" style="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/walgreensdeals';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">deals at Walgreens</a> this week here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christine</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43268</link>
		<dc:creator>christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43268</guid>
		<description>my walgreens actually had a little sign posted about the january booklet coupon...apparently there was a misprint.  the coupon was supposed to be for the dream blonde color, which is regular like $15.  so that&#039;s why it wouldn&#039;t work on the regular loreal preference color that was in this week&#039;s ad.  i ended up voiding my transaction too.  seems like they would have to honor it regardless.  kinda disappointing :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my walgreens actually had a little sign posted about the january booklet coupon&#8230;apparently there was a misprint.  the coupon was supposed to be for the dream blonde color, which is regular like $15.  so that&#8217;s why it wouldn&#8217;t work on the regular loreal preference color that was in this week&#8217;s ad.  i ended up voiding my transaction too.  seems like they would have to honor it regardless.  kinda disappointing <img src='http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elise</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43265</link>
		<dc:creator>Elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43265</guid>
		<description>What coupons did you end up using instead? I&#039;m trying to figure out the best deal without that one Walgreens coupon that isn&#039;t scanning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What coupons did you end up using instead? I&#8217;m trying to figure out the best deal without that one Walgreens coupon that isn&#8217;t scanning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina L.</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43256</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43256</guid>
		<description>The same thing here too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same thing here too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43255</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43255</guid>
		<description>Same thing,I just voided the transaction.  We often use 2 wag&#039;s cps. I think its something else with that coupon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same thing,I just voided the transaction.  We often use 2 wag&#8217;s cps. I think its something else with that coupon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43251</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43251</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you can use 2 Walgreens coupons.  That&#039;s probably why it didn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you can use 2 Walgreens coupons.  That&#8217;s probably why it didn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43250</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43250</guid>
		<description>Oh, my goodness!  I had the same exact thing happen to me today! The cashier and assistant manager tried and tried to get the $3.00 coupon from the January coupon book to work without any success. It is a legitimate Walgreen&#039;s coupon for Loreal Preference hair color, but it WOULD NOT scan. And I ended up paying $3.50 each rather than $0.50 each. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, my goodness!  I had the same exact thing happen to me today! The cashier and assistant manager tried and tried to get the $3.00 coupon from the January coupon book to work without any success. It is a legitimate Walgreen&#8217;s coupon for Loreal Preference hair color, but it WOULD NOT scan. And I ended up paying $3.50 each rather than $0.50 each. <img src='http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43248</guid>
		<description>Mine said the same thing, it ended up costing me about $6 total instead of $1 total.  It was something I wanted, but didn&#039;t work out quite like I thought it would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine said the same thing, it ended up costing me about $6 total instead of $1 total.  It was something I wanted, but didn&#8217;t work out quite like I thought it would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elise</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43245</link>
		<dc:creator>Elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43245</guid>
		<description>I tried to do the loreal preference hair color &amp; the store wouldnt take the coupon from the January coupon book : ( They said it was only for the Loreal Blonde something... Anyone have any luck with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to do the loreal preference hair color &amp; the store wouldnt take the coupon from the January coupon book : ( They said it was only for the Loreal Blonde something&#8230; Anyone have any luck with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammi</title>
		<link>http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/#comment-43231</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024#comment-43231</guid>
		<description>I hope I can find the L&#039;oreal.......I really like that type of Shampoo/Conditioner!  Thanks for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I can find the L&#8217;oreal&#8230;&#8230;.I really like that type of Shampoo/Conditioner!  Thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 499/503 objects using apc

Served from: commonsensewithmoney.com @ 2012-02-09 23:47:49 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk: enhanced
Cache key:          2010/01/walgreens-loreal-preference-tresemme-gillette/feed/_index.html
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      Page is feed
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.474s
Header info:
X-Pingback:         http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:13:30 GMT
ETag:               "a07053a9b5e1f8fe407ca798835390b5"
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.9.2.4
Link:               <http://www.commonsensewithmoney.com/?p=14024>; rel=shortlink
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->
